High-res HTML5 panos for iPad and PC/Mac Safari

Q&A about the latest versions
Post Reply
erik leeman
Posts: 470
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:51 am
Contact:

Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:55 pm

Hi all,

I've made some HTML5-versions of recent panos to see what kind of image quality I could squeeze out of my newly-bought iPad.
One thing that puzzles me is that exactly the same pano looks considerably worse on the iPad than on a regular computer screen.
However, I see no mention of this anywhere, so I am wondering if I'm the only one who sees this difference.
A reason could be that for the iPad pano quality was deliberately traded for speed, its processor isn't much of a powerhouse after all.
Or is it something Mobile Safari does automatically to reduce memory consumption?
If so, can we switch that mechanism off?

Here are links to some examples:
http://tinyurl.com/iPad-Kamenicky01 (3.2MB)
http://tinyurl.com/iPad-Plymouth (5.6MB)
http://tinyurl.com/iPad-HaytorRocks (4.2MB)
http://tinyurl.com/iPad-Lizardpoint-01 (3.6MB)

Cube faces are 1930x1930, I made them using PTGui and Photoshop, not Pano2VR, so I had full control over their quality.
Again, file size doesn't interest me in this case, this test is about image quality.

Cheers!

Erik
User avatar
Hopki
Gnome
Posts: 10336
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:16 pm
Location: Layer de la Haye, Essex UK
Contact:

Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:02 pm

Hi Erik
I only have my little IPod Touch so I can not help, I did try and open one, POP GOES THE IPOD, well it resets it.
Martin :lol:
Hopki
Garden Gnome Software Support
If you send an e-mail to support please send a link to the forum post for reference.
support@ggnome.com
https://ggnome.com/wiki/documentation/
erik leeman
Posts: 470
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:51 am
Contact:

Thu Sep 02, 2010 9:19 pm

Well, I did mention they were for iPad or 'larger' didn't I ; )
I'm not sure if screens as small as the iPod's really are worthwhile making panos for.

Here's another big one:
http://tinyurl.com/iPad-Lindava-01 (4.42MB)

Erik
erik leeman
Posts: 470
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:51 am
Contact:

Tue Nov 16, 2010 1:20 am

I've done some 1 on 1 comparisons on the iPad, using 1930x1930 and 1066x1066 cube faces of the same pano.
The 1930x1930 set was 5.37MB, the 1066x1066 set was 1.80MB in size.
That's a substantial difference in MegaBytes, considering both were compressed at the same quality setting.

What I found:
a. The difference in image quality of the resulting Webkit CSS3/JavaScript panos as displayed by Safari on my 1920x1200 PC-screen is quite dramatic.

b. On the iPad the difference in image quality is negligible, but both look considerably worse than the original cube faces!

Apparently the iPad (and/or pano2vr_player.js?) does strange things with those cube faces, which is a pity.

Screenshots of this test can be found on my Flickr pages, here are direct links to the 1024x768 versions:

iPad screenshot 1066x1066 pano (@ vFoV 50degrees) vs 100% crop of an original 1066x1066 cubeface
http://www.flickr.com/photos/erik-nl/51 ... 1/sizes/o/

iPad screenshot 1930x1930 pano (@ vFoV 50degrees) vs 100% crop of an original 1930x1930 cubeface
http://www.flickr.com/photos/erik-nl/51 ... 3/sizes/o/

iPad screenshot 1066x1066 pano vs iPad screenshot 1930x1930 pano (both @ vFoV 50degrees)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/erik-nl/51 ... 1/sizes/o/

Note:
At the same vFoV of 50 degrees the 1930 version is displayed a bit smaller than its original size, but the 1066 version needs to be made larger than it actually is by pano2vr_player.js!

Erik
User avatar
alabwab
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 3:43 pm
Contact:

Mon Nov 29, 2010 4:07 pm

Hi Eric,
Have You already found out something new concerning tile sizes, output restrictions for iDevices, and optimization for html5 output in general?
Do You have any recommendations?

Greetings from Alois
Post Reply