greetings, I'm testdriving pano2qtvr right now and I'm in love with the program
anyway,
I have some images that are around 6,000 x 3,000 dpi and the file for flash or qtvr are around 7-9mb!!!
I need something more internet friendly... how could I reduce the size of the file?
I wanted something similar in quality to:
http://www.fullscreenqtvr.com/
all help is really appresiate
Leonardo
smaller file size!!! (7mb?)
what is an acceptable size for internet viewing? (full screen)
what size of imagine do you guys recommend and what settings? to get best output in terms of quality vs size?
thanks! I really appreciate your help!
leo
what size of imagine do you guys recommend and what settings? to get best output in terms of quality vs size?
thanks! I really appreciate your help!
leo
Last edited by 1eo on Wed Apr 25, 2007 8:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- 360Texas
- Moderator
- Posts: 3684
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:06 pm
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas USA
- Contact:
Canon 5d, Sigma 8mm, Raw images 4 +1, convert to TIF, stitch 2500 x 5000ppi 45mb. Resize to 2000 x 4000ppi 33mb. Use Pano2Qtvr to cube, fix nadir, create a QTVR about 1.5mb.
Yes we display full screen on a 22" Samsung LCD 226bw. Looks great !
Oh and dpi means dots per inch for printing. PPI or pixels per inch for displaying on a computer monitor. But then you already knew these terms.
Hope this helps
Yes we display full screen on a 22" Samsung LCD 226bw. Looks great !
Oh and dpi means dots per inch for printing. PPI or pixels per inch for displaying on a computer monitor. But then you already knew these terms.
Hope this helps
You don't need to change the input image size. Just change the tile size to for example 1500 or even less and reduce the tile - Jpeg quality
MfG, Thomas
thank you Thomas... I just bought your software today (got a lot to learn! )thomas wrote:You don't need to change the input image size. Just change the tile size to for example 1500 or even less and reduce the tile - Jpeg quality
btw... what does the subdivision do?
Image sizes are good but why remove the "standard" explorer navigation stuff and the scroll bars are removed?
If I click a link to one of the links on the panorama page because you have used JavaScript window I have no navigation and I can't get back to the panorama.
You've taken a good deal of time to have the google advertisements but, because there are no scroll bars I can only see some of the bottom of the screen... i.e. window size minus ( the title bar plus the status bar ) equals what's left for viewing... Usually better to just open a "full" window so you don't have to make the calculations and the end user can still get around.
Personally I prefer a page that is the individual "data item" that has next prev AND the list box you have is good. But it is tougher to just "go through" the items one by one.
Looks really good though and I had no viewing problems relative to the VR itself.
If I click a link to one of the links on the panorama page because you have used JavaScript window I have no navigation and I can't get back to the panorama.
You've taken a good deal of time to have the google advertisements but, because there are no scroll bars I can only see some of the bottom of the screen... i.e. window size minus ( the title bar plus the status bar ) equals what's left for viewing... Usually better to just open a "full" window so you don't have to make the calculations and the end user can still get around.
Personally I prefer a page that is the individual "data item" that has next prev AND the list box you have is good. But it is tougher to just "go through" the items one by one.
Looks really good though and I had no viewing problems relative to the VR itself.