moving object in flash

Specific Q&A about the new Flash export
Locked
Fernando Costa Pinto
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Salvador, Brazil

Mon Dec 04, 2006 2:52 pm

Hi there ,

I would like to know if is normal to have much less quality in the moving objects , between Flash and Quicktime .

Because that's what I am getting.

In the Flash platform , the colours of the objects do NOT get consistent , the image is not perfect , as it is in Quicktime platform.

Am I missing something ?

thanks

Fernando
Fernando Costa Pinto
fcp.fernando@gmail.com
Graymalkin
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 2:27 pm
Location: Volkswagen AG, Wolfsburg, Germany
Contact:

Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:02 pm

Fernando Costa Pinto wrote:Am I missing something ?
The reason is the way Flash handles bitmap antialiasing. Since the rendering quality is being set to "low" while the pano is being panned in favor of motion smoothness and performance, Flash switches antialiasing from bicubic to nearest neighbour.

Quicktime is handling bitmaps way better than Flash does. No surprise considering that Flash was originally developed to process vector graphics.

Cheers,
Gray
Fernando Costa Pinto
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Salvador, Brazil

Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:45 pm

...Since the rendering quality is being set to "low" ...


I tried every configurations ... high , no loss , and even so , the result is not good , except when the size is so big that uses all screen , but then , it becomes so heavy, that I get in doubt it will be practical.

The problems are bigger when there are objects with strong colours .

thanks for helping

Fernando
Fernando Costa Pinto
fcp.fernando@gmail.com
Graymalkin
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 2:27 pm
Location: Volkswagen AG, Wolfsburg, Germany
Contact:

Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:49 pm

What's the resolution of the images you're using?

[edit]
And: Did you use Pano2QTVR's option to optimize the cube faces size (Settings > Tile Settings > Cube Face Size)? The program recommends the optimal value there.
[/edit]
Fernando Costa Pinto
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Salvador, Brazil

Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:33 pm

Hi, thanks for the help ...

I am using 1280 x 960 with around 215 KB.

After you mentioned ...I did used optimization , but didn't noticed much difference.

There's a huge difference between Quicktime and Flash .
The texture of tissues with strong colours , is particularly affected.

rgds

Fernando
Fernando Costa Pinto
fcp.fernando@gmail.com
User avatar
thomas
Chief Gnome
Posts: 2554
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:56 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria
Contact:

Mon Dec 04, 2006 7:33 pm

Can you post examples? Beside of aliasing both technologies should deliver the same results....
MfG, Thomas
User avatar
hum@no.id
Posts: 945
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:35 pm
Location: Dark side of the Moon
Contact:

Mon Dec 04, 2006 9:02 pm

For fast service (realtor spot) - checked constant

EP - 1800x900
CF - 6x600
Fernando Costa Pinto
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Salvador, Brazil

Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:59 pm

Hi ,

I will post some examples ...soon...

...............
For fast service (realtor spot) - checked constant

EP - 1800x900
CF - 6x600
........

What is this ?

rgds

Fernando
Fernando Costa Pinto
fcp.fernando@gmail.com
Locked