About quality render

Q&A about the latest Pano2QTVR beta version
User avatar
hum@no.id
Posts: 945
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:35 pm
Location: Dark side of the Moon
Contact:

About quality render

Post by hum@no.id » Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:08 pm

Hi, thomas!


Here, Does not slowly movement before stoped (slower finish without render degradation)...

http://www.go360edinburgh.co.uk/qtvr/la ... ?fitwindow

----------
from last post:

http://www.pano2qtvr.com/forum/phpBB2/v ... 749d54#364

This is make with older BETA's ?

This seems more nice with instant stoped motion...

Thnx.

User avatar
thomas
Chief Gnome
Posts: 2538
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:56 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria
Contact:

Post by thomas » Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:18 pm

This are the checkboxes in the current beta, namely reduce quality while moving and reduce stage quality. You should be able to generate the same pano with beta6.
MfG, Thomas

User avatar
hum@no.id
Posts: 945
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:35 pm
Location: Dark side of the Moon
Contact:

Post by hum@no.id » Mon Oct 30, 2006 8:40 pm

Excuse me, for persistence...

I'm tested all combination and variables, but... I did not obtain such effect...

Check please and you make sure...

http://www.go360edinburgh.co.uk/qtvr/la ... ?fitwindow

User avatar
thomas
Chief Gnome
Posts: 2538
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:56 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria
Contact:

Post by thomas » Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:23 pm

Ok, here are the settings I guess he used:

Quality: 8
Automatic decrease when moving: no
Dynamic stage rendering quality: yes

So this would make the following code for the config file:
flash.mesh.base=8
flash.mesh.auto=0
flash.changequality=1
But maybe just ask Kevin . :D
MfG, Thomas

User avatar
hum@no.id
Posts: 945
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:35 pm
Location: Dark side of the Moon
Contact:

Post by hum@no.id » Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:51 pm

>> But maybe just ask Kevin?

Thank you, good thought...

I'm after help don't get this result :?

----------
(Hidden thoughts)

Maybe, size has importance? :D

my pano source 3000x1500...

Uphhhh.. :?

Kevin Greig
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:26 am
Location: Edinburgh,Scotland
Contact:

Post by Kevin Greig » Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:01 pm

I spent a few days resolving what worked best for me and came up with the following project file, this contains all the settings used for my flash output!

These settings may not be ideal for everybody, but they show what was used for the file you mentioned.

I found the distortion unreasonable when "automatic decrease when moving" is selected.

I use Pano2QYVR 1.5.0beta2 pro flash - and love it!

http://www.go360edinburgh.co.uk/go360_SWF.pqp

Hope this helps - Kevin.

Kevin Greig
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:26 am
Location: Edinburgh,Scotland
Contact:

Post by Kevin Greig » Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:25 pm

Last edited by Kevin Greig on Sat Dec 16, 2006 12:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
thomas
Chief Gnome
Posts: 2538
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:56 pm
Location: Vienna, Austria
Contact:

Post by thomas » Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:32 pm

Ahhhhhhh..... ok. Now its clear. This is tricky ;). beta2 doesn't scale with the Stage, instead it uses the scale mode "noBorder" so part of the fullscreen effect is upscaling the Flash window. Of course you lose quality but it increases speed.... and I didn't even noticed at first sight :).

You should get the same effect now with "no Scale with Stage" in Pano2QTVR and the option scale="noBorder" in the HTML. Maybe I make this available again in Pano2QTVR.
MfG, Thomas

Kevin Greig
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:26 am
Location: Edinburgh,Scotland
Contact:

Post by Kevin Greig » Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:38 pm

I was having a problem with the "spot in QuickTime" setting not being accurate - see the Greyfriars Bobby link, but I did put this down to my flash size ration in the window, better that than distorting the flash to fit!

Kevin

User avatar
hum@no.id
Posts: 945
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:35 pm
Location: Dark side of the Moon
Contact:

Post by hum@no.id » Tue Oct 31, 2006 3:50 pm

Thank you Kevin, for support. :)

I have found that your file of the project not to do now exactly so... in new version BETA (6).

_______

Hi! Thomas

I think that this more it is important - visual quality..

>> Maybe I make this available again in Pano2QTVR.

Yessssssss...


>>>You should get the same effect now with "no Scale with Stage" in Pano2QTVR and the option scale="noBorder" in the HTML.

:!: :?:

I'm downloading Kevin's SWF file in local machine and playing with standalone Player... effect is not changed... What here parameters HTML???

-------------

Please, do not leave and forget this problem... in new betas or release

I certain that you will find compromise..

pS.

I am a weeping - I have not save BETA2 :cry: ( :wink: )

Kevin Greig
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:26 am
Location: Edinburgh,Scotland
Contact:

Post by Kevin Greig » Tue Oct 31, 2006 6:22 pm

Glad to help!

User avatar
hum@no.id
Posts: 945
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:35 pm
Location: Dark side of the Moon
Contact:

Post by hum@no.id » Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:12 pm

I think... that mr. Thomas will take our desires and we see in new beta #7 (Lucky number :!: ) rollback older and perfect render :lol:


or... i shall ask again about one service ... (speaks in whisper.. about beta2) :wink:

Thnx

Kevin Greig
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:26 am
Location: Edinburgh,Scotland
Contact:

Re: About quality render

Post by Kevin Greig » Sat Dec 16, 2006 12:53 am

hum@no.id wrote:Hi, thomas!


Here, Does not slowly movement before stoped (slower finish without render degradation)...

http://www.go360edinburgh.co.uk/qtvr/la ... ?fitwindow

----------
from last post:

http://www.pano2qtvr.com/forum/phpBB2/v ... 749d54#364

This is make with older BETA's ?

This seems more nice with instant stoped motion...

Thnx.

Kevin Greig
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:26 am
Location: Edinburgh,Scotland
Contact:

Post by Kevin Greig » Sat Dec 16, 2006 12:53 am

hum@no.id wrote:Excuse me, for persistence...

I'm tested all combination and variables, but... I did not obtain such effect...

Check please and you make sure...

http://www.go360edinburgh.co.uk/qtvr/la ... ?fitwindow

Kevin Greig
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:26 am
Location: Edinburgh,Scotland
Contact:

Post by Kevin Greig » Sat Dec 16, 2006 12:54 am

hum@no.id wrote:Excuse me, for persistence...

I'm tested all combination and variables, but... I did not obtain such effect...

Check please and you make sure...

http://www.go360edinburgh.co.uk/qtvr/la ... ?fitwindow

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests